FairRentWize

Birmingham-Hoover vs Bismarck

Fair Market Rent Comparison — HUD 2025 Data

Quick Answer

Bismarck is 6% cheaper for renters. A 2-bedroom rents for $817/mo vs $863/mo in Birmingham-Hoover — saving $552/year.

Rent by Unit Size

Unit SizeBirmingham-HooverBismarckDifference
Studio$540$555$15
1 Bedroom$687$667$20
2 Bedrooms$863$817$46
3 Bedrooms$1,083$1,020$63
4 Bedrooms$1,216$1,141$75
Median Income$46,088$52,444$6,356

Birmingham-Hoover

Studio
$540/mo
1 BR
$687/mo
2 BR
$863/mo
3 BR
$1,083/mo
4 BR
$1,216/mo
Median Income
$46,088/yr
Full Birmingham-Hoover profile →

Bismarck

Studio
$555/mo
1 BR
$667/mo
2 BR
$817/mo
3 BR
$1,020/mo
4 BR
$1,141/mo
Median Income
$52,444/yr
Full Bismarck profile →

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Birmingham-Hoover or Bismarck cheaper to rent in?
Bismarck is cheaper — a 2-bedroom Fair Market Rent is $817/mo vs $863/mo in Birmingham-Hoover. That's $46/mo or $552/year more expensive in Birmingham-Hoover (6% higher).
What is the 2-bedroom rent in Birmingham-Hoover vs Bismarck?
The HUD Fair Market Rent for a 2-bedroom in Birmingham-Hoover is $863/month. In Bismarck, a 2-bedroom FMR is $817/month.
How do incomes compare between Birmingham-Hoover and Bismarck?
The median household income in Birmingham-Hoover is $46,088/year. In Bismarck it is $52,444/year. Bismarck has the higher median income.
What is the studio rent in Birmingham-Hoover vs Bismarck?
A studio apartment Fair Market Rent in Birmingham-Hoover is $540/mo. In Bismarck it is $555/mo.