FairRentWize

Birmingham-Hoover vs Tuscaloosa

Fair Market Rent Comparison — HUD 2025 Data

Quick Answer

Tuscaloosa is 12% cheaper for renters. A 2-bedroom rents for $772/mo vs $863/mo in Birmingham-Hoover — saving $1,092/year.

Rent by Unit Size

Unit SizeBirmingham-HooverTuscaloosaDifference
Studio$540$503$37
1 Bedroom$687$612$75
2 Bedrooms$863$772$91
3 Bedrooms$1,083$937$146
4 Bedrooms$1,216$1,049$167
Median Income$46,088$39,330$6,758

Birmingham-Hoover

Studio
$540/mo
1 BR
$687/mo
2 BR
$863/mo
3 BR
$1,083/mo
4 BR
$1,216/mo
Median Income
$46,088/yr
Full Birmingham-Hoover profile →

Tuscaloosa

Studio
$503/mo
1 BR
$612/mo
2 BR
$772/mo
3 BR
$937/mo
4 BR
$1,049/mo
Median Income
$39,330/yr
Full Tuscaloosa profile →

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Birmingham-Hoover or Tuscaloosa cheaper to rent in?
Tuscaloosa is cheaper — a 2-bedroom Fair Market Rent is $772/mo vs $863/mo in Birmingham-Hoover. That's $91/mo or $1,092/year more expensive in Birmingham-Hoover (12% higher).
What is the 2-bedroom rent in Birmingham-Hoover vs Tuscaloosa?
The HUD Fair Market Rent for a 2-bedroom in Birmingham-Hoover is $863/month. In Tuscaloosa, a 2-bedroom FMR is $772/month.
How do incomes compare between Birmingham-Hoover and Tuscaloosa?
The median household income in Birmingham-Hoover is $46,088/year. In Tuscaloosa it is $39,330/year. Birmingham-Hoover has the higher median income.
What is the studio rent in Birmingham-Hoover vs Tuscaloosa?
A studio apartment Fair Market Rent in Birmingham-Hoover is $540/mo. In Tuscaloosa it is $503/mo.