FairRentWize

Bismarck vs Stockton

Fair Market Rent Comparison — HUD 2025 Data

Quick Answer

Bismarck is 35% cheaper for renters. A 2-bedroom rents for $817/mo vs $1,105/mo in Stockton — saving $3,456/year.

Rent by Unit Size

Unit SizeBismarckStocktonDifference
Studio$555$733$178
1 Bedroom$667$934$267
2 Bedrooms$817$1,105$288
3 Bedrooms$1,020$1,414$394
4 Bedrooms$1,141$1,601$460
Median Income$52,444$61,057$8,613

Bismarck

Studio
$555/mo
1 BR
$667/mo
2 BR
$817/mo
3 BR
$1,020/mo
4 BR
$1,141/mo
Median Income
$52,444/yr
Full Bismarck profile →

Stockton

Studio
$733/mo
1 BR
$934/mo
2 BR
$1,105/mo
3 BR
$1,414/mo
4 BR
$1,601/mo
Median Income
$61,057/yr
Full Stockton profile →

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Bismarck or Stockton cheaper to rent in?
Bismarck is cheaper — a 2-bedroom Fair Market Rent is $817/mo vs $1,105/mo in Stockton. That's $288/mo or $3,456/year more expensive in Stockton (35% higher).
What is the 2-bedroom rent in Bismarck vs Stockton?
The HUD Fair Market Rent for a 2-bedroom in Bismarck is $817/month. In Stockton, a 2-bedroom FMR is $1,105/month.
How do incomes compare between Bismarck and Stockton?
The median household income in Bismarck is $52,444/year. In Stockton it is $61,057/year. Stockton has the higher median income.
What is the studio rent in Bismarck vs Stockton?
A studio apartment Fair Market Rent in Bismarck is $555/mo. In Stockton it is $733/mo.