FairRentWize

Bismarck vs Tuscaloosa

Fair Market Rent Comparison — HUD 2025 Data

Quick Answer

Tuscaloosa is 6% cheaper for renters. A 2-bedroom rents for $772/mo vs $817/mo in Bismarck — saving $540/year.

Rent by Unit Size

Unit SizeBismarckTuscaloosaDifference
Studio$555$503$52
1 Bedroom$667$612$55
2 Bedrooms$817$772$45
3 Bedrooms$1,020$937$83
4 Bedrooms$1,141$1,049$92
Median Income$52,444$39,330$13,114

Bismarck

Studio
$555/mo
1 BR
$667/mo
2 BR
$817/mo
3 BR
$1,020/mo
4 BR
$1,141/mo
Median Income
$52,444/yr
Full Bismarck profile →

Tuscaloosa

Studio
$503/mo
1 BR
$612/mo
2 BR
$772/mo
3 BR
$937/mo
4 BR
$1,049/mo
Median Income
$39,330/yr
Full Tuscaloosa profile →

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Bismarck or Tuscaloosa cheaper to rent in?
Tuscaloosa is cheaper — a 2-bedroom Fair Market Rent is $772/mo vs $817/mo in Bismarck. That's $45/mo or $540/year more expensive in Bismarck (6% higher).
What is the 2-bedroom rent in Bismarck vs Tuscaloosa?
The HUD Fair Market Rent for a 2-bedroom in Bismarck is $817/month. In Tuscaloosa, a 2-bedroom FMR is $772/month.
How do incomes compare between Bismarck and Tuscaloosa?
The median household income in Bismarck is $52,444/year. In Tuscaloosa it is $39,330/year. Bismarck has the higher median income.
What is the studio rent in Bismarck vs Tuscaloosa?
A studio apartment Fair Market Rent in Bismarck is $555/mo. In Tuscaloosa it is $503/mo.