FairRentWize

Richmond vs Tuscaloosa

Fair Market Rent Comparison — HUD 2025 Data

Quick Answer

Tuscaloosa is 32% cheaper for renters. A 2-bedroom rents for $772/mo vs $1,021/mo in Richmond — saving $2,988/year.

Rent by Unit Size

Unit SizeRichmondTuscaloosaDifference
Studio$669$503$166
1 Bedroom$842$612$230
2 Bedrooms$1,021$772$249
3 Bedrooms$1,317$937$380
4 Bedrooms$1,453$1,049$404
Median Income$69,914$39,330$30,584

Richmond

Studio
$669/mo
1 BR
$842/mo
2 BR
$1,021/mo
3 BR
$1,317/mo
4 BR
$1,453/mo
Median Income
$69,914/yr
Full Richmond profile →

Tuscaloosa

Studio
$503/mo
1 BR
$612/mo
2 BR
$772/mo
3 BR
$937/mo
4 BR
$1,049/mo
Median Income
$39,330/yr
Full Tuscaloosa profile →

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Richmond or Tuscaloosa cheaper to rent in?
Tuscaloosa is cheaper — a 2-bedroom Fair Market Rent is $772/mo vs $1,021/mo in Richmond. That's $249/mo or $2,988/year more expensive in Richmond (32% higher).
What is the 2-bedroom rent in Richmond vs Tuscaloosa?
The HUD Fair Market Rent for a 2-bedroom in Richmond is $1,021/month. In Tuscaloosa, a 2-bedroom FMR is $772/month.
How do incomes compare between Richmond and Tuscaloosa?
The median household income in Richmond is $69,914/year. In Tuscaloosa it is $39,330/year. Richmond has the higher median income.
What is the studio rent in Richmond vs Tuscaloosa?
A studio apartment Fair Market Rent in Richmond is $669/mo. In Tuscaloosa it is $503/mo.