FairRentWize

Rochester vs Santa Cruz-Watsonville

Fair Market Rent Comparison — HUD 2025 Data

Quick Answer

Rochester is 95% cheaper for renters. A 2-bedroom rents for $903/mo vs $1,760/mo in Santa Cruz-Watsonville — saving $10,284/year.

Rent by Unit Size

Unit SizeRochesterSanta Cruz-WatsonvilleDifference
Studio$594$1,172$578
1 Bedroom$739$1,475$736
2 Bedrooms$903$1,760$857
3 Bedrooms$1,112$2,195$1,083
4 Bedrooms$1,294$2,530$1,236
Median Income$52,618$89,493$36,875

Rochester

Studio
$594/mo
1 BR
$739/mo
2 BR
$903/mo
3 BR
$1,112/mo
4 BR
$1,294/mo
Median Income
$52,618/yr
Full Rochester profile →

Santa Cruz-Watsonville

Studio
$1,172/mo
1 BR
$1,475/mo
2 BR
$1,760/mo
3 BR
$2,195/mo
4 BR
$2,530/mo
Median Income
$89,493/yr
Full Santa Cruz-Watsonville profile →

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Rochester or Santa Cruz-Watsonville cheaper to rent in?
Rochester is cheaper — a 2-bedroom Fair Market Rent is $903/mo vs $1,760/mo in Santa Cruz-Watsonville. That's $857/mo or $10,284/year more expensive in Santa Cruz-Watsonville (95% higher).
What is the 2-bedroom rent in Rochester vs Santa Cruz-Watsonville?
The HUD Fair Market Rent for a 2-bedroom in Rochester is $903/month. In Santa Cruz-Watsonville, a 2-bedroom FMR is $1,760/month.
How do incomes compare between Rochester and Santa Cruz-Watsonville?
The median household income in Rochester is $52,618/year. In Santa Cruz-Watsonville it is $89,493/year. Santa Cruz-Watsonville has the higher median income.
What is the studio rent in Rochester vs Santa Cruz-Watsonville?
A studio apartment Fair Market Rent in Rochester is $594/mo. In Santa Cruz-Watsonville it is $1,172/mo.