FairRentWize

Rochester vs Tuscaloosa

Fair Market Rent Comparison — HUD 2025 Data

Quick Answer

Tuscaloosa is 17% cheaper for renters. A 2-bedroom rents for $772/mo vs $903/mo in Rochester — saving $1,572/year.

Rent by Unit Size

Unit SizeRochesterTuscaloosaDifference
Studio$594$503$91
1 Bedroom$739$612$127
2 Bedrooms$903$772$131
3 Bedrooms$1,112$937$175
4 Bedrooms$1,294$1,049$245
Median Income$52,618$39,330$13,288

Rochester

Studio
$594/mo
1 BR
$739/mo
2 BR
$903/mo
3 BR
$1,112/mo
4 BR
$1,294/mo
Median Income
$52,618/yr
Full Rochester profile →

Tuscaloosa

Studio
$503/mo
1 BR
$612/mo
2 BR
$772/mo
3 BR
$937/mo
4 BR
$1,049/mo
Median Income
$39,330/yr
Full Tuscaloosa profile →

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Rochester or Tuscaloosa cheaper to rent in?
Tuscaloosa is cheaper — a 2-bedroom Fair Market Rent is $772/mo vs $903/mo in Rochester. That's $131/mo or $1,572/year more expensive in Rochester (17% higher).
What is the 2-bedroom rent in Rochester vs Tuscaloosa?
The HUD Fair Market Rent for a 2-bedroom in Rochester is $903/month. In Tuscaloosa, a 2-bedroom FMR is $772/month.
How do incomes compare between Rochester and Tuscaloosa?
The median household income in Rochester is $52,618/year. In Tuscaloosa it is $39,330/year. Rochester has the higher median income.
What is the studio rent in Rochester vs Tuscaloosa?
A studio apartment Fair Market Rent in Rochester is $594/mo. In Tuscaloosa it is $503/mo.